Search

Search Cadence Lab

31 searchable pages

Open full search
Diagnostic

CX Systems Diagnostic

Find the source of customer friction across teams, systems, ownership, and handoffs.

Diagnostic

Lifecycle Risk Review

Learn which customer signals matter, who should respond, and what to improve before renewal risk becomes urgent.

Diagnostic

CRM Workflow Audit

Find where CRM workflows, data, automation, and ownership get in the way of customer work.

Free toolsBrowse all six

Free CX and AI Tools

Use six free tools to evaluate AI use cases, map handoffs, sort feedback, review CRM data, and plan service recovery.

Free tool

AI Use Case Stress Test

Identify readiness gaps, ownership questions, failure points, and the smallest useful AI test.

Free tool

CX Handoff Mapper

Map a customer journey across people, teams, and systems to find weak handoffs and missing owners.

Free tool

AI Evaluation Builder

Turn an AI task and its failure modes into a rubric, test cases, reviewer rules, and stop conditions.

Free tool

CRM Data Health Sampler

Review a CSV sample for missing values, duplicates, inconsistent formats, and fields that may not support the workflow.

Free tool

Service Recovery Planner

Turn a customer failure into a recovery plan with clear ownership, timing, communication, and follow-up.

Experience design

AI Customer Experience Design

Design AI experiences with clear roles, trustworthy context, human judgment, safe recovery, and measurable outcomes.

Customer problem

User Adoption Fatigue

Find why people verify, correct, or bypass a workflow, then fix the work before asking for more adoption.

Customer problem

Executive Misalignment

Turn competing priorities into a clear decision, accountable ownership, and a practical operating sequence.

Workflow guide

Salesforce Tracing

Follow customer work through Salesforce records, automation, ownership, handoffs, and outcomes.

Workflow guide

Cross-Functional Handoffs

Find where customer context, ownership, or urgency gets lost between teams and systems.

Workflow guide

Service Escalation Maps

Map the conditions, ownership, authority, context, and response needed before a service issue becomes a failure.

Workflow guide

AI-to-Human Routing

Design routing around clear boundaries, safe pauses, useful context, human authority, and accountable outcomes.

AI tooling

AI Copilot Design

Bring trusted context into real workflows, support better decisions, and keep people accountable for the outcome.

AI tooling

PII Scrubbing for AI Workflows

Reduce unnecessary personal data in AI workflows with clear boundaries, tested transformations, and accountable review.

AI tooling

Prompt Injection Controls

Reduce prompt injection risk with clear trust boundaries, limited permissions, enforceable policy, and adversarial testing.

Start here

Fit Check

Find out whether your customer experience, CRM, or AI initiative is ready for a useful next step.

Contact

Contact Matt Rabah

Share a customer experience, lifecycle risk, CRM workflow, or AI readiness problem and get a direct response.

Free voice-of-customer tool

Find the signal without flattening the story.

Paste a small set of anonymized customer comments. The sorter groups recurring themes, shows the evidence behind each one, and keeps mixed or isolated observations visible.

Sort customer feedback

How it works

Patterns are clues. Comments are evidence.

The sorter uses a visible set of customer-experience terms to group comments. It counts mentions and shows the original comments so you can challenge every result.

It is a rule-based aid, not semantic AI, sentiment research, or a representative customer study. It can organize a sample; it cannot tell you how common an issue is in the wider population.

Sort the sample

Use comments you are allowed to analyze.

Remove names, email addresses, account identifiers, health or payment details, and confidential or regulated information before pasting. Put one customer comment on each line.

What it preserves

The pattern and the exception.

  1. 01

    Frequency How often did a theme appear?

  2. 02

    Evidence Which comments support the grouping?

  3. 03

    Direction Were the signals positive, negative, mixed, or unclear?

  4. 04

    Exceptions Which comments did not fit a recurring theme?